Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Universal Test To Rule All Soil Types

    1:55 pm, July 26, 2022

    All about shrub willow (a bioenergy crop)

    1:39 pm, July 26, 2022

    Measuring Carbon Nanotubes Taken Up By Plants

    1:33 pm, July 26, 2022
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn RSS
    Food Agrotech
    • Home
      • About Us
    • Articles
      • Hydroponics
      • Aquaponics
      • Aeroponics
      • Digital Farming
      • Vertical Farming
      • Food/Beverages
      • Innovation / Technology
      • Research
    • Breaking News
    • Startups & Deals
    • Contact
    Food Agrotech
    Home»Food/Beverages»The Effect of Increased Corn Prices on Cattle Finishing
    Food/Beverages

    The Effect of Increased Corn Prices on Cattle Finishing

    9:20 am, June 17, 2022
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Because of the rise in grain price over the previous year, many farmers who raise cattle are keeping a close eye on the situation and trying to estimate the impact it will have on their financial situation. An agricultural economist from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign investigates the effect that relatively high maize prices have on the cost of gain in feeding and the overall net return for cattle that are being finished.

    Corn cost futures for the July 2022 deal (December 2022 contract) surged to $7.75 per bushel ($7.30 per bushel) by the middle of April, having been priced at $6.00 per bushel ($5.55 per bushel) at the beginning of January. In addition, while utilizing the iFarm Price Distribution tool on April 26, it was possible that the expiry price for the December corn futures contract would be above $8.55 per bushel or even below $6.05 per bushel. Both of these outcomes had a 25 percent probability of occurring. There is significant unpredictability surrounding corn prices for the remainder of this year because the ratio of corn stocks to use in the United States is currently only 9.6 percent. Additionally, there are ongoing questions relating to the corn acreage in the United States in 2022.

    Gain Feeding Cost

    The cost of gain per unit of feed is susceptible to variations in maize and alfalfa prices and feed conversion rates. The Focus on Feedlots newsletter publishes monthly articles that provide data on the above mentioned topics. The feeding cost of growth is depicted in Figure 1 for the period beginning in January 2012 and continuing through February 2022. Corn was priced at $6.58 per bushel, and alfalfa was priced at $207 a ton in inventories during February 2022. After averaging $80.50 per cwt. in 2020 & $100.40 in 2021, the price of gain due to feeding was $113.10 and $113.75 for January and February, respectively. According to the February edition of Focus on Feedlots, the projected cost of gain associated with feeding was $125 per cwt for placements in February. It is essential to remember that the price of maize has been steadily climbing since this estimation was produced.

    The cost of feeding for gain for the remaining months of 2022 was approximated using forecasts of corn and alfalfa prices taken at the midpoint of April, as well as seasonal average feed conversions. Because the feeding cost of gain is estimated using corn prices from the time cattle are placed until they are sold, the exceptionally high maize prices we are presently seeing will affect the feeding cost of gain for the remainder of 2022. With this information in mind, the cost of gain due to feeding will be anticipated to vary from $112 to $115 per cwt. During the second quarter of 2021, the highest cost comes in June. In the third quarter, it is anticipated that the price of gain due to feeding would vary between $118 and $121. The anticipated range for the feeding cost of gain for the fourth quarter is from $120 to $123 per cwt. The highest price is in October. If these expenses are achieved, they will constitute the best feeding cost of gain since before the first quarter of 2013. This will be the case if and only if they are realized.

    Also Read:  How to Make an Investment in Agriculture Even If You Don't Own a Farm

    Net Gains from Cattle Finishing

    Figure 2 depicts the financial profits of cattle finishing operations every month from January 2012 through February 2022. It is crucial to keep in mind that closeout months were used in calculating net returns instead of placement months. The calculation of net returns utilized a variety of data sources. Using the Focus on Feedlots newsletter, the Livestock Marketing Information Center, and interest rates from the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, we calculated the average daily gain, feed conversions, the number of days on feed, and the total cost of revenue.

    The net returns have been going in the wrong direction after a successful performance in the fourth quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2022. It is anticipated that the average losses will fall between $10 and $50 during the second quarter of 2022. If the cost of feeding and gaining weight stays at the levels described above, it is anticipated that losses will continue throughout the remainder of 2022.

    The Influence that Variations in Corn Prices Have on Feeding Costs of Gain & Net Returns

    Using data from the previous ten years, a regression model was used to assess the level of sensitivity of the feeding cost of gain to shifts in the prices of corn, alfalfa, and feed conversion. This allowed for determining the sensitivity of the feeding cost of gain. The findings are as follows, according to the research: The cost of feeding animals rises by $0.86 per cwt for every $0.10 per bushel rise in the value of maize, while the cost of feeding animals rises by $0.59 per cwt for every $5 per ton rise in the value of alfalfa. Increasing feed conversion by 0.10 increases the feeding cost of revenue by 1.10 dollars per hundredweight. The economist calculated the coefficients of separate determination to understand better the influence that feeds conversion, corn price, and alfalfa price had on the cost of feeding gain (Langemeier et al., 1992). The impact of each independent variable on the dependent variable may be measured with the help of these coefficients, which can be employed in the process. In the feeding cost of gain regression, the R-square goodness of fit measure was 0.956, and the total of the coefficients of independent determination for each variable equalled that value. According to this goodness-of-fit statistic, 95.6% of the variance in feeding cost of gain was described by changes in feed conversions, corn prices, and alfalfa prices. It is indicated by the fact that the statistic was applied. According to the results of independent determination coefficients that were computed, the price of corn explained roughly 71 percent of the variance in the feeding cost of gain.

    Also Read:  Economists Plan For Prevented Planting In 2022

    As was mentioned before, there is now a differential of more than $2 per bushel in the price of December corn futures at expiry between the lowest and top 25 percentiles of the market. In the forecasts presented above, corn prices were assumed to fall somewhere in the middle of the range. As an illustration, it was anticipated that the monthly closeout price for maize would be $7.25 on average. If the price of maize were $1 less ($1 higher), the cost of gain from feeding the animal would be $109.55 ($126.75) instead of $118.15.

    In addition to the cost of gain associated with feeding, the ratio of the price of the feeder to the price of the fed product is sensitive to fluctuations. A regression analysis was carried out to investigate the nature of the connection between these variables. The following are the findings: a $3.12 decrease in net returns for finishing cattle occurs for every head for every $1 rise in the feeding cost of gain, and an $8.24 decline in net returns for finishing cattle occurs for every 1% increase in the ratio of the value of feeder cattle to the price of fed cattle. According to the sensitivity analysis results shown above, there is an $8.60 change in feeding cost of gain for every $1 change in maize prices. It amounts to a change in cattle finishing net returns of $27 per head.

    The price of corn has shown consistent growth during the first part of this year, and analysts anticipate that it will continue to have a high degree of volatility throughout the remainder of the year. The effects of rising maize prices on the feeding cost of gain and net returns for cattle finishing were analyzed in this paper. When the price of maize goes up by $0.10, the cost of feeding cattle to acquire weight goes up by $0.86 per cwt, and the net returns that cattle earn from finishing go down by $2.70 per head.

    Agronomy Articles Corn Farming
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    How Cattle Grazing affects the Soybean yields

    11:55 am, July 26, 2022

    11 Edible Flowers

    7:27 am, July 25, 2022

    Now is the Time to Develop a Fungicide Plan to Preserve Maize Yields from Tar Spot

    10:57 am, June 17, 2022

    Modern Agri -Tech Solutions for Better Future

    10:29 am, June 17, 2022

    Economists Plan For Prevented Planting In 2022

    9:05 am, June 17, 2022

    Prospective Plant Nutrition Research on a Global Scale

    12:36 pm, June 16, 2022
    • Top News
    • Breaking News

    IoT in Agriculture: An Intimidating yet Exciting Industry

    2:17 pm, July 19, 2022

    A Delicate Balance Between Protein Content And Chalky Rice Grains

    1:07 pm, July 18, 2022

    Measuring Soil Health By Measuring Carbondioxide Flush

    12:56 pm, July 18, 2022

    A Preliminary Framework For Designing Better Urban Agroforestry

    11:50 am, July 18, 2022

    Uncovering Best Practices For Cover Crops To Optimize Crop Production

    9:57 am, July 15, 2022

    Green offering by 2024

    2:57 pm, July 14, 2022

    Soaring fertilizer prices force farmers to rethink

    2:44 pm, July 14, 2022

    Research Indicates an Increase in Cassava Yields in Phosphorous and Liming

    2:34 pm, June 29, 2022

    Suitable Variety of Lentils for Suitable Land

    1:53 pm, June 29, 2022

    Does your Farm Need a Data Manager?

    1:45 pm, June 29, 2022

    Hydroponic Farming Establishment Just Vertical Fosters Indoor Growth

    1:25 pm, June 23, 2022

    Defra seeks Feedback on New Innovation Fund

    12:11 pm, June 23, 2022

    Grace Communications Unveils Water Footprint of Food

    11:03 am, July 4, 2022

    Higher Input Prices Impacting the Food security, Farmers and Earth

    11:00 am, July 4, 2022

    Severe Scarcity Influences Ghana’s Savanna region: How Oil seeds Could Support Boost Local Diets

    10:59 am, July 4, 2022

    Pilot Program for the development of a Better Seaweed Supply Chain

    10:58 am, July 4, 2022

    MAFAP Renewed – Better Policies, a Better Agri-food Industry

    10:57 am, July 4, 2022

    Is Seaweed the Forthcoming Huge Alternative to Meat?

    10:55 am, July 4, 2022

    How Smart are Smart Farms?

    10:54 am, July 4, 2022

    Agrifood Systems – a Win for a Healthy Environment

    10:53 am, July 4, 2022

    Food Affordability Becomes a Federal Election Issue in Canada

    10:51 am, July 4, 2022

    Canadian Agri-food Sector under Serious Threat after Chinese Ban on Canadian Meat

    10:38 am, July 4, 2022

    Pressure of Customer‘s demand for Organic and Local Food Products Leading to Seismic Shifts in the Sector

    10:37 am, July 4, 2022

    The Competitive Agri-food Industry

    10:35 am, July 4, 2022
    Contact

    Have other questions or enquiries?

    Email Us: [email protected]

    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn RSS
    © 2023 All rigths reserved Food Agrotech.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Fill in your info and join us today!

      By signing up, you agree to the our terms and our Privacy Policy agreement.